Skip to main content

#9 Crew of Endurance v. Dr. Mann

Today we discuss Space Crime #9, which examines the actions of one Dr. Mann in the film Interstellar — by actions, I mean pretty much everything he does in the movie. Anyone who’s seen it knows that Mann messed up (pun intended). So, logically the next question is just what would happen if Mann, or rather his estate (*spoiler alert* he dies), were taken to court.


(Read the full list of the galaxy’s greatest space crimes here.)
To begin:
  • He falsified the data about his “habitable” planet
  • He tried to kill his fellow space travelers and actually succeeded with one of them
  • And he damaged their ship the Endurance in his suicidal attempt to manually dock their other ship


archer-do-you-hate-matt-damon-yet-no-hes-still-a-spirate.jpg


To make sure that he gets his day in court we need to figure out (1) where a case could be brought and (2) what the claims would be.

Proper Forum

The first question we have got to address is where this case can be brought. Article VIII of the United Nations Outer Space Treaty states, a nation that launches anything into space “shall retain jurisdiction and control over such object, and over any personnel thereof, while in outer space or on a celestial body.”


So, which nation launched these guys into space? Hm, I wonder if these US flags are a clue.
To narrow it down to which court in the U.S., though, is harder. In one of the early scenes in the movie, Cooper takes Murph to a baseball game, and on the side of the stadium it says “The World Famous New York Yankees.”


So New York is probably a reasonable guess for where Cooper is from. Where Dr. Mann is from (and we’re gonna assume for these purposes that it is the same place as NASA since he probably spent a lot of time there) is a little harder: all we know is that Cooper drives for a while to get there and there’s a shot of his map in the movie but it doesn’t seem to be, um . . . real.


Still, Dr. Mann must have spent a lot of time with NASA, resulting in the parties residing in the same state; so that rules out diversity jurisdiction, which leaves “arising under” a federal question jurisdiction. In order to achieve arising under jurisdiction, they will need to bring a claim involving federal law.


Also, to be noted. They could bring the claim in New York state court, so long as Dr. Mann has minimum contacts there.

Claims

So if we are stuck with a state court and state law, there are a few different options. But while Dr. Mann would almost definitely be found guilty under criminal law, you can’t drag a dead man into criminal court.


Even without this, though, you can still sue his estate. So that would probably be the best bet. Here are just a few of the more obvious claims to make:


  • Assault and battery claims by Cooper and Romilly
  • Negligence in docking the ship.
  • Fraud, for Mann’s misrepresentation of his planet’s viability
  • Potential breach of contract with NASA
  • and much, much more!
However, the question we really want to answer is if there is any applicable space law:




Unfortunately, the UN Outer Space treaty doesn’t do much in addressing the possibility of space crime. There is an “International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities” in the works that might address this but is incomplete and unavailable. So we can’t use that yet. Nor has the U.S. Congress really passed much legislation on this subject, if any.


Basically, there’s a complete lack of precedent and of real foundation for space law. But there are some options for the future. One option would be to simply extend some of the above-mentioned claims into space through Congressional law-making (remember, the U.S. under the Outer Space Treaty still has jurisdiction over anything it sends into space!). That same hypothetical statute could even great a federal cause of action to meet federal “arising under” jurisdiction. Easy solution, right? And with plenty of room to accommodate our growing space crime needs.


For now, though, I advocate a Regina v. Dudley & Stephens approach. 14 Q.B.D. 273 (Queen’s Bench Division. 1884). In that case, four men were adrift in a small boat on the high seas and (to skip the gory details) two of those men chose to kill a third in order to stay alive. Turns out, though, that they ended up being rescued and were later found guilty of murder despite their claim of necessity. Now, space is to us what the high seas were to those men - something untamed and largely out of our control. There is even a “Moon Treaty” (referenced in The Martian) that isn’t yet ratified but that, if applicable, would require maritime law in space. So it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to hold Dr. Mann to a similar standard.


In the end, though, we will just have to wait and see what the future, and more particularly SpaceX, brings. Till then we will have to glean a few more ideas from the rest of the Top 10 Space Crimes that science fiction has given us!

By Shelise Rupp


Future Reading:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2036

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#8 International Space Agency v. Mark Whatney

Mars: The next frontier Elon Musk has been all over space news in recent years with his now famous goal to take humans to our red sister planet . Despite what you may think, he’s not the only one; MarsOne (debatably), NASA , and Mars Base Camp , all have plans to put humans on Mars in the next few decades. Though there are some very convincing skeptics ( Neil Degrasse Tyson ); many people, myself included, are excited to see if Space X can pull it off and to see the subsequent flux in space law . ( See here for more on Musk). There is just one problem.  Haven’t we already gone to Mars?  Didn’t Matt Damon already make it there?  Well, not exactly.  But he did play a convincing Martian.  Mark Watney — the lovable sarcastic astronaut, the man who stakes a personal claim to many firsts in space for humans, even being the first space pirate.   (Go here for the complete list of top 10 space crimes.) What it takes to be a space pirate (a.k.a Spirate) Mark Watney spent 549 S

State v. Han Solo

Finally, an answer to the age-old question: Would Han be found guilty of the murder of Greedo the Young in a court of law. This article will show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Han Solo should be found ‘not guilty.’ (Go here for a list of the  Top 10 Space Crimes ) “But wait!” You should probably be thinking. “How can we know that? What are murder laws like in space?” The short answer is space is the final frontier, and therefore we developed the Intergalactic Multiverse Court to  fill in the gaps . And now, I'll beat both Coop and Dr. Strange to the gun by writing the first opinion. But first, look at little Greedo dancing 1. Lack of evidence against Mr. Solo The prosecution could potentially seek three distinct outcomes. First- or second-degree murder, or manslaughter. In all cases, they will have to prove all elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution seeks first-degree murder they will need to prove that the murder was

Top 10 Space Crimes Ever

If you’re like me (and like most people), after you watch a movie you’re primary reaction is: sure the action was alright, but where’s the legal analysis? That’s why we’ve used our vague and complex rubric to compile this list of the top 10 space crimes ever committed. Besides, considering the dearth of “real” human activity in space, these “fake” film scenes provide a stellar platform for the much-desired application of space law. #1 Inhabitants of Alderaan, deceased v. Galactic Empire, Grand Moff Tarkin Grand Moff Tarkin told the Death Star to blow up the planet of Alderaan, and that’s exactly what it did. The first Death Star’s superlaser created a superluminal boost , pushing Alderaan’s mass into hyperspace and destroying it instantly along with its 2 billion inhabitants. That is what we call planetary genocide, and the Empire must pay. via GIPHY #2 Crew of Discovery I v.  Heuristically Programmed Algorithmic Computer 9000 In 2001: A Space Odyssey , Heuristically Prog