Skip to main content

#9 Crew of Endurance v. Dr. Mann

Today we discuss Space Crime #9, which examines the actions of one Dr. Mann in the film Interstellar — by actions, I mean pretty much everything he does in the movie. Anyone who’s seen it knows that Mann messed up (pun intended). So, logically the next question is just what would happen if Mann, or rather his estate (*spoiler alert* he dies), were taken to court.


(Read the full list of the galaxy’s greatest space crimes here.)
To begin:
  • He falsified the data about his “habitable” planet
  • He tried to kill his fellow space travelers and actually succeeded with one of them
  • And he damaged their ship the Endurance in his suicidal attempt to manually dock their other ship


archer-do-you-hate-matt-damon-yet-no-hes-still-a-spirate.jpg


To make sure that he gets his day in court we need to figure out (1) where a case could be brought and (2) what the claims would be.

Proper Forum

The first question we have got to address is where this case can be brought. Article VIII of the United Nations Outer Space Treaty states, a nation that launches anything into space “shall retain jurisdiction and control over such object, and over any personnel thereof, while in outer space or on a celestial body.”


So, which nation launched these guys into space? Hm, I wonder if these US flags are a clue.
To narrow it down to which court in the U.S., though, is harder. In one of the early scenes in the movie, Cooper takes Murph to a baseball game, and on the side of the stadium it says “The World Famous New York Yankees.”


So New York is probably a reasonable guess for where Cooper is from. Where Dr. Mann is from (and we’re gonna assume for these purposes that it is the same place as NASA since he probably spent a lot of time there) is a little harder: all we know is that Cooper drives for a while to get there and there’s a shot of his map in the movie but it doesn’t seem to be, um . . . real.


Still, Dr. Mann must have spent a lot of time with NASA, resulting in the parties residing in the same state; so that rules out diversity jurisdiction, which leaves “arising under” a federal question jurisdiction. In order to achieve arising under jurisdiction, they will need to bring a claim involving federal law.


Also, to be noted. They could bring the claim in New York state court, so long as Dr. Mann has minimum contacts there.

Claims

So if we are stuck with a state court and state law, there are a few different options. But while Dr. Mann would almost definitely be found guilty under criminal law, you can’t drag a dead man into criminal court.


Even without this, though, you can still sue his estate. So that would probably be the best bet. Here are just a few of the more obvious claims to make:


  • Assault and battery claims by Cooper and Romilly
  • Negligence in docking the ship.
  • Fraud, for Mann’s misrepresentation of his planet’s viability
  • Potential breach of contract with NASA
  • and much, much more!
However, the question we really want to answer is if there is any applicable space law:




Unfortunately, the UN Outer Space treaty doesn’t do much in addressing the possibility of space crime. There is an “International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities” in the works that might address this but is incomplete and unavailable. So we can’t use that yet. Nor has the U.S. Congress really passed much legislation on this subject, if any.


Basically, there’s a complete lack of precedent and of real foundation for space law. But there are some options for the future. One option would be to simply extend some of the above-mentioned claims into space through Congressional law-making (remember, the U.S. under the Outer Space Treaty still has jurisdiction over anything it sends into space!). That same hypothetical statute could even great a federal cause of action to meet federal “arising under” jurisdiction. Easy solution, right? And with plenty of room to accommodate our growing space crime needs.


For now, though, I advocate a Regina v. Dudley & Stephens approach. 14 Q.B.D. 273 (Queen’s Bench Division. 1884). In that case, four men were adrift in a small boat on the high seas and (to skip the gory details) two of those men chose to kill a third in order to stay alive. Turns out, though, that they ended up being rescued and were later found guilty of murder despite their claim of necessity. Now, space is to us what the high seas were to those men - something untamed and largely out of our control. There is even a “Moon Treaty” (referenced in The Martian) that isn’t yet ratified but that, if applicable, would require maritime law in space. So it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to hold Dr. Mann to a similar standard.


In the end, though, we will just have to wait and see what the future, and more particularly SpaceX, brings. Till then we will have to glean a few more ideas from the rest of the Top 10 Space Crimes that science fiction has given us!

By Shelise Rupp


Future Reading:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2036

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Space Crimes Ever

If you’re like me (and like most people), after you watch a movie you’re primary reaction is: sure the action was alright, but where’s the legal analysis? That’s why we’ve used our vague and complex rubric to compile this list of the top 10 space crimes ever committed. Besides, considering the dearth of “real” human activity in space, these “fake” film scenes provide a stellar platform for the much-desired application of space law. #1 Inhabitants of Alderaan, deceased v. Galactic Empire, Grand Moff Tarkin Grand Moff Tarkin told the Death Star to blow up the planet of Alderaan, and that’s exactly what it did. The first Death Star’s superlaser created a superluminal boost , pushing Alderaan’s mass into hyperspace and destroying it instantly along with its 2 billion inhabitants. That is what we call planetary genocide, and the Empire must pay. via GIPHY #2 Crew of Discovery I v.  Heuristically Programmed Algorithmic Computer 9000 In 2001: A Space Odyssey , Heuristically ...

Space Crime #3 Hitchhiker’s Guide: 3 reasons the Vogons should get the book

For thousands of years, humanity has wondered how the world would end. The ancient Sumerians, for example, thought a planet called Nibiru was on a collision course with Earth. The speculations have only increased in recent years: A meteor (like the imaginary one that attracted a strong following during the 2016 U.S Presidential Election), nuclear war , global warming , or even artificial intelligence (which Elon Musk, head of SpaceX, recently called our “biggest existential threat ”). But what if they were wrong? What if instead, it will be giant slug-like intergalactic creatures called Vogons who destroy the earth to make room for a hyperspatial express route? In addition to being somewhat of a bummer (after all, then we would never live to see a world of fully autonomous cars , supersonic hyperloops , and ultra-high bandwidth brain-machine interfaces ), the scenario poses the all-important question: Is there a legal remedy? The civil legal issues raised by de...

Space Crime #5 Guardians: Star Lord isn’t a total A-hole but he is guilty

Nova Corps v. Guardians of the Galaxy Everyone has already seen Guardians of the Galaxy, the best of the not-all-that-super, super hero movies. But it’s so good, I’m sure nobody will mind watching this clip one more time again. (Catch up on the Top 10 Space Crimes here .) So, Peter Quill a.k.a. Star Lord, a Terran, busts out of the Kyln (Coordinates: M20H 119919142+0185112.), the highest security Nova Corp prison, with a few of his pals: a talking raccoon, a big tree thing, a green female assassin, and a big, dumb, muscular dude with tattoos. Everything about this says “crime.” But let’s see if we can get Pete off the hook. The Outer Space Treaty doesn’t apply The Outer Space Treaty is really cool and stuff, but unfortunately treaties only apply to signing parties, and even then, they’re pretty easy to get out of. Although the large majority of Earth’s countries have signed the treaty, Nova Corp is not a signatory. Therefore, it does not apply even though Quill is ...